text.skipToContent text.skipToNavigation
  1. Home
  2. Protec PPE Blog
  3. What does the new Deregulation Bill mean for health and safety

First announced in the Queen’s Speech in 2013, the proposed Deregulation Bill is set to exempt some self-employed people from health and safety legislation. The bill has been based on a report by Professor Ragnar Löfstedt commissioned by the UK government to review the health and safety law back in March 2011.


In his report, entitled Reclaiming Health and Safety, he suggested removing certain responsibilities from self-employed people providing they do not pose a risk to others in a workplace.                                                                                                                                           

Critics of the new bill and the research have pointed out that if this is intended to apply to people who only work on their own, then they are in essence only protecting self-employed people from being prosecuted if they injure themselves. It does seem to be rather self-defeating to prosecute someone who has posed not threat to anyone else but has only injured him or her self, and in fact, no such case has ever been recorded.

 

So, why the need for the change in the law?

 

If a self-employed person was prosecuted for causing risk or injury to someone else, then this would surely be self evident proof that they did pose a risk and would not be exempt from the law in the first instance. It seems to be a case of using pubic money to protect people from a situation that has never actually occurred up to this point.

 

In a submission made by Unite the Union providing damning statistics to the Health and Safety Executive, it was revealed that self-employed people are twice more likely to be killed than employees. With a fatality rate of 1.2 per 100,000 for self-employed against 0.5 per 100,000 for employees, the difference is significant.

 

Many self-employed people work in hazardous industries, such as agriculture and construction, where the term self-employed is slightly misleading. They work on sites, and with other people around. In fact, in many instances they are to all intents and purposes employees but with fewer rights.

 

Some companies even use self-employed freelancers to limit their expenditure on taxes and employer responsibilities. This method of using self-employed workers even extends to nurses and doctor in hospitals, and if there is a clearer example of someone being responsible for someone else’s well-being then it is hard to imagine.

 

The removal of certain parts of the 1974 Health and Safety Act by this new Deregulation Bill seems to be creating a minefield of confusion where there doesn’t need to be one. Those who are self-employed may not fully know whether the law applies to them or not in certain situations. Those who presume they are exempt may act accordingly and could risk endangering others in turn. This could have disastrous consequences in the long term.

 

The aim of all health and safety regulation is to protect all workers, not just those who happen to be employed in the conventional sense. It seems strange to adapt a law that doesn’t need to be adapted (given the lack of precedent of prosecuting oneself), and this may lead to little but an increase in confusion.

 

Health and safety in the workplace has long been going in the right direction, so why do anything to alter its course?


Comments


Latest Blogs

Many work environments can pose potential risks to vision, demonstrated by the 800,000 eye injuries that occur in workplaces around the world every year. 


24 August 2021

The Covid-19 pandemic has changed the way we work in many ways. 

Government guidance for well over a year has advised that those who can work from home, should work from home. However, despite the pandemic, life still has to go on – and with this comes the need for in-home workers, such as maintenance staff and support workers.

26 May 2021

This article provides guidance on the flood risk to your property or site when applying for planning permission. The content is neither exhaustive nor prescriptive, but you must demonstrate to your Local Planning Authority (LPA) that you have considered and taken steps to manage flood risk as part of your development proposal. By the end of this concise guide, you’ll be able to carry out a simple flood risk assessment yourself.


11 May 2021

As COVID-19 lockdown measures ease across the country, employers must plan how employees can safely return to work. There are two main considerations to make: adhering to the latest government guidelines on COVID-19 and taking the correct steps to ensure that employees maintain social distancing in the workplace at all times.

This article explains how employees can maintain social distancing in the workplace, ensuring a safe, COVID-secure return to work.

3 May 2021